Western Digital - Revision history

TheDragonFire123: /* RPM under-reporting controversy */

2021-08-10T23:04:51Z

RPM under-reporting controversy

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:04, 10 August 2021
Line 18:		Line 18:

	===RPM under-reporting controversy===		===RPM under-reporting controversy===
	In 2020, it was discovered that many Western Digital drives at 8 TB capacity or above spun at 7,200 RPM, despite misleading marketing and SMART data that claims 5,400 RPM; WD advertised not an RPM number, but a vague "performance class", which was used to defend the deception. This discovery included various shucked drives, but also [[Western Digital Red Plus\|Red/Red Plus ~~drives~~]] whose marketing claimed 5,400 RPM. Despite some defending this discovery, claiming that free performance was handed out, it was discovered that the drives most likely "detune" or firmware throttle themselves to 5,400 RPM performance, while retaining 7,200 RPM's greater and more undesirable power usage.		In 2020, it was discovered that many Western Digital drives at 8 TB capacity or above spun at 7,200 RPM, despite misleading marketing and SMART data that claims 5,400 RPM; WD advertised not an RPM number, but a vague "performance class", which was used to defend the deception. This discovery included not only [[Western Digital Internal Use\|various shucked drives]], but also [[Western Digital Red Plus\|Red/Red Plus]] and [[Western Digital Purple]] drives whose marketing claimed 5,400 RPM.<ref>{{Cite web\|url = https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/09/western-digital-is-trying-to-redefine-the-word-rpm/\|title = Western Digital is trying to redefine the word “RPM”\|last1 = Salter\|first1 = Jim\|website = Ars Technica\|date = 8 September 2020\|access-date = 11 August 2021}}</ref> Despite some defending this discovery, claiming that free performance was handed out, it was discovered that the drives most likely "detune" or firmware throttle themselves to 5,400 RPM performance, while retaining 7,200 RPM's greater and more undesirable power usage.

	All Red Plus drives affected received new model numbers whose firmware and marketing correctly report 7,200 RPM. No such action was ~~taken~~ for ~~internal use~~ drives.		All Red Plus drives affected received new model numbers whose firmware and marketing correctly report 7,200 RPM. Some Internal Use drives also received the same treatment, but no such action was identified for Purple drives yet.

	==References==		==References==

TheDragonFire123: /* RPM under-reporting controversy */

2021-03-19T22:02:56Z

RPM under-reporting controversy

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 19 March 2021
Line 20:		Line 20:
	In 2020, it was discovered that many Western Digital drives at 8 TB capacity or above spun at 7,200 RPM, despite misleading marketing and SMART data that claims 5,400 RPM; WD advertised not an RPM number, but a vague "performance class", which was used to defend the deception. This discovery included various shucked drives, but also [[Western Digital Red Plus\|Red/Red Plus drives]] whose marketing claimed 5,400 RPM. Despite some defending this discovery, claiming that free performance was handed out, it was discovered that the drives most likely "detune" or firmware throttle themselves to 5,400 RPM performance, while retaining 7,200 RPM's greater and more undesirable power usage.		In 2020, it was discovered that many Western Digital drives at 8 TB capacity or above spun at 7,200 RPM, despite misleading marketing and SMART data that claims 5,400 RPM; WD advertised not an RPM number, but a vague "performance class", which was used to defend the deception. This discovery included various shucked drives, but also [[Western Digital Red Plus\|Red/Red Plus drives]] whose marketing claimed 5,400 RPM. Despite some defending this discovery, claiming that free performance was handed out, it was discovered that the drives most likely "detune" or firmware throttle themselves to 5,400 RPM performance, while retaining 7,200 RPM's greater and more undesirable power usage.

	All Red Plus drives affected received new model numbers whose firmware and marketing correctly report 5,~~400~~ RPM.		All Red Plus drives affected received new model numbers whose firmware and marketing correctly report 7,200 RPM. No such action was taken for internal use drives.

	==References==		==References==

TheDragonFire123: added Category:Hard drive manufacturers using HotCat

2021-03-19T09:57:57Z

added Category:Hard drive manufacturers using HotCat

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:57, 19 March 2021
Line 24:		Line 24:
	==References==		==References==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}

			[[Category:Hard drive manufacturers]]

TheDragonFire123: Created page with "'''Western Digital Corporation''' (also known by acronyms WDC or WD) is a major hard drive manufacturer based in the United States. ==Families== ;Blue *Western Digital Blue..."

2021-03-19T09:57:33Z

Created page with "'''Western Digital Corporation''' (also known by acronyms WDC or WD) is a major hard drive manufacturer based in the United States. ==Families== ;Blue *Western Digital Blue..."

New page

'''Western Digital Corporation''' (also known by acronyms WDC or WD) is a major hard drive manufacturer based in the United States.

==Families==
;Blue
*[[Western Digital Blue Desktop|Desktop]]
*[[Western Digital Blue Mobile|Mobile]]

==Controversies==
===Green head parking controversy===
In 2012, widespread reports of premature failure of Caviar Green drives (such as Sadle G6 drives) were reported. The cause was isolated to firmware optimised for power saving aggressively unloading the heads after a mere eight seconds, the lowest known in the industry at the time. Coupled with generally low load/unload cycle count limits such as 300,000, this flaw allowed hard drives affected to rapidly exceed their ratings and, due to debris being spread by wearing plastic ramps, allow premature failure.

WD released a tool that would fix the problem, [[wdidle3]]. The fallout from this controversy led to the rebranding of all Green drives as Blues by 2015.<ref>{{cite web|url = https://techreport.com/news/29251/western-digital-paints-its-green-hard-drives-blue-in-rebranding|title = Western Digital paints its Green hard drives Blue in rebranding|last1 = Johnson|first1 = Renee|publisher = The Tech Report}}</ref>

===Red undisclosed shingled magnetic recording controversy===
Beginning in 2018, Red family models began to be largely supplanted by shingled magnetic recording (SMR) drives, generally from the Carmel and Venice families. Due to complications of SMR and its required workarounds, necessarily slow performance caused many RAID rebuilds to fail, often puzzling server operators until the cause, undisclosed SMR, was disclosed in 2020. Similar models were submarined into the Blue family, but were less widely covered.

This controversy led to the discovery of other models from [[Seagate]] and [[Toshiba]] being discovered to be undisclosed SMR. As reconciliation, WD split the Red family into [[Western Digital Red Plus|Red Plus]], which would contain all CMR drives. The vanilla Red family was repurposed as a sole SMR family. WD is the only manufacturer to sell SMR drives for NAS usage, which still causes much outcry in the community.

===RPM under-reporting controversy===
In 2020, it was discovered that many Western Digital drives at 8 TB capacity or above spun at 7,200 RPM, despite misleading marketing and SMART data that claims 5,400 RPM; WD advertised not an RPM number, but a vague "performance class", which was used to defend the deception. This discovery included various shucked drives, but also [[Western Digital Red Plus|Red/Red Plus drives]] whose marketing claimed 5,400 RPM. Despite some defending this discovery, claiming that free performance was handed out, it was discovered that the drives most likely "detune" or firmware throttle themselves to 5,400 RPM performance, while retaining 7,200 RPM's greater and more undesirable power usage.

All Red Plus drives affected received new model numbers whose firmware and marketing correctly report 5,400 RPM.

==References==
{{reflist}}